Frankenstein :: essays research papers

1. List the form of address and author of the work you get.Frankenstein by Mary Shelley2. Briefly describe the plot (action) of the work. What happens?Robert Walton (the first narrator) finds Victor Frankenstein adrift in the Arctic. after a weeks recovery Frankenstein tells his story. As Victor was growing up he had always been interested in alchemy and pseudo-sciences. He hoped to one day to be able overcome death and decay. Victor learned how to substantiate believe life in the laboratory and collected parts from cadavers to create his beast. After giving his creation life, he was horrified and fled. He was hidden off for two years, then received a letter telling of his subatomic brothers death. He suspect the creature, but the police suspected a female friend of his familys and hanged her. One day the organism found Victor and told him of his survival and his knowledge. He requested Victor ease up him a companion and in return they would flee away neer to be seen again . He eventually agrees to make the bride, but after practically pondering destroys all the work he had done. The monster curses Frakenstein assuring revenge on his wedding night. Later another of his friends turns up dead. Victor noneffervescent do plans to marry Elizabeth with whom he was raised. On their wedding night she is strangled by the monster. He follows the monster pledging to destroy it. The story leads to where he is interpreted aboard the ship. Soon after the story Victor dies. The monster s discovered on board and announces his plans to kill himself.3. How would you describe the authors style? Examine the way the author writes, considering word choice, point of view, structure, special techniques (i.e., symbolism).I really liked the way Shelley told the story from different points of view. She made the story whole by telling what Victor thought and what the creature thought. I also liked the way she didnt just plunk down right into the central story, but laid ou t an outer frame. Shelley tries to make an intimately read story by telling it from all angles and makes it a little different with the story inside of the story.4. Was this an easy work to read? Why or why not?I believe it was easily read. There was no overly difficult language. If you did have to pause in the middle of the story it was easily picked up again without rereading sections a distich times.