Gender differences in communicating relationship expectations Research Paper

Gender differences in communicating relationship expectations (interpersonal communication) - Research Paper ExampleWhen we clear with other people, we do non vertical say words but we say it with different tone of voice and sometimes, actions. This is what interpersonal communication is all ab unwrap. With just a different tone of voice, the recalling differs. Our facial expression also is an important factor in the interpersonal communication. How we look in conversing with others will mean differently. Our gestures as well as our body language also affect our communication with others. Because of gestures, the other person might understand what we mean in a different way.It is very important that we study the aspects of interpersonal communication because we surely want to convey the message the way we want to be understood. Since everyday of our lives, we communicate, we gain to communicate effectively and efficiently.The first principle of interpersonal communication is it being inescapable (King, 2000). A person cannot not communicate. We cannot escape from communication even if we essay to. Though we might not talk or use words to converse to others, our gestures, facial expression may do it for us. We must always take to be that people cannot read our minds, thus whatever we put in words or show in our body language, will be understood as such by our receivers. It is our behaviour that is understood by people (King, 2000).Interpersonal communication is irreversible (King, 2000). We cannot take back something what we already said. For example, because of our anger, we might burst out words we really do not mean to say to someone. But we know that these words be really not meant to hurt the person we are talking to, but the words already pained the other person. Even if we wanted to take back everything that we have said, the hurt and pain it has caused will not be taken away from that person.The third principle is interpersonal communication bein g complicated (King, 2000). According to King (2000), theorists