HRM Case Study on Home Depot Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

HRM Case Study on Home memory board - Essay Exampleces in which hands and women were diverted to certain fonts of jobs based on their sexual urge since the company believed that their productivity would be higher by placing these workers in specific areas.Home Depot separated women and men workers into two separate categories of workers. Men were condition most of the floor position based on the belief that men attain more universal knowledge about home repairs, while women were given most of the cashier positions based on the impudence that they are more suitable for these jobs and the fact that the resume pool showed that more women have experience as cashiers than men do. The end result of this practice was that the composition of the jobs at Home Depot followed a odd distribution which proved Home Depot was intentionally segmenting the jobs among gender. The work employment data of Home Depot showed that 70% of men work as floor employees, while 70% of women worked in cas hier positions. This type of secernment is a type of discrimination called statistical discrimination. Statistical discrimination findings are most normally used to detect racial discrimination cases, but the underlying principles of the discrimination apply the same for gender bias as it does for racial bias. Statistical discrimination occurs when an employer makes a hiring or work placement termination based on subjective beliefs about the respective probability that white and black workers are one by one qualified for (People). In the Home Depot case instead of black and white the statistical discrimination occur based on man and women segmentation.The business strategy the company utilized had a unanimous foundation and was the driving force behind the move. Men have culturally in our society have been the ones that do most of the household repairs, thus the company wanted to capitalize on this fact in order to enhance their customer service capabilities. The company knew th ey were doing something illegal and wanted to hide the illegal exercise